Wikipedia

2.3
2.3 from 271 Reviews and Ratings
Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.

Average Rating

2.3

/
5

271 Reviews

5 Star
22%
4 Star
12%
3 Star
2%
2 Star
4%
1 Star
60%

Filtered Reviews

Filter Reviews

Review Time

They contain a lot of valuable human…

They contain a lot of valuable human knowledge, but their moderators are biased power hungry folks. They keep off notable articles, reject good sources, and are politically biased. It’s one of the best concepts in world history marred by petty human ego and greed, sadly.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
What I noticed was all the centrist…

What I noticed was all the centrist groups that leaned slightly to the right were all termed Right wing extremists!! Do not touch this site!!

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
My account was blocked but after a few…

My account was blocked but after a few days of emailing, it was unblocked and things were back to normal.

4
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
They blocked my account for no reason

They blocked my account for no apparent reason and wont unblock it. wikipedia sucks so dont ever use this crappy site.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Block this site from your Google…

Block this site from your Google search. Anyone can add information to this site, even though it holds itself out as authoritative. Many contributions go unchecked an no contributions are paid for. Contributors cannot promote their business interests or are banned. Therefore the contributor has some agenda other than a commercial one. Someone is taking time to publish information with no financial incentive. Collectively the contributors have some hidden agenda. Distrust where this website could be taking us. The propagnda passes through many reader's filters because it presents itself as impartial. At least an advertiser is upfront about their motivation.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Good Concept

Good Concept. Very helpful often.

5
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
The dome of the rock mosque page should…

The dome of the rock mosque page should mention in the title that it is a mosqueI can't edit it

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
No business perspectives

Don’t bother contributing to Wikipedia. You will not get paid, Without notice, they will delete your post if it links back to your Website on the basis of self promotion (even if written in an unbiased tone.). So, what business person would contribute to it. It wouldn’t make sense. It lacks any business perspective. It’s a total pie in the sky view of everything. Go somewhere where you at least know how your being sold to.In case you think it is factual, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia. Anyone, and most of it goes unchecked by unpaid time wasters.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
This site shouldn't contain -pedia in…

This site shouldn't contain -pedia in it. It's full of bull crap and it has nothing that even close relates to the actual facts. Especially the areas concerning history, warfare, nations, politics etc. are highly compromised and are nothing more than a propaganda.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
lying and misguiding people

Wikipedia to so many people and misguides them. It is shameful because most people think Wikipedia is a reliable source. It disrespects many peoples religions and cultures.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001

Is this your business?

Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.

Business Details

  • Wikipedia is a free, web-based, collaborative, and multilingual encyclopedia. It is the largest and most popular general reference work on the internet, consisting of freely editable content by a community of volunteers. Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization, it aims to provide a summary of all human knowledge to everyone, globally.