Review Time
I used to love wiki and would use it as a main source of info and donated several times. No longer. Wiki has become about as accurate as fact checkers on facebook and become about as reliable in searching out truths as Snopes. Which is to say very very unreliable. Wiki has swung so far left that it doesn't even bother trying to hide its bias. They will never get another click from me.
Really unreliable. I am shocked to be honest. i always knew that you can't use Wikipedia for research purposes, for obvious reasons. However i have never thought that an obvious false information is so hard to change. I just sent a request and i almost got blocked by a hyper sensitive egoistic author. Wikipedia does not offer any solution to that. NEVER USE IT
[This review pertains to the English Wikipedia]Sometimes, there's vandalism, but it's often quickly reverted.Wikipedia isn't the disinformation pit people still claim it is, and articles have citations in them.------------------------------------------------Note: Some of the reviews on this page are harmful, such as:+ the one from the person who edited a page on their corporation (which is discouraged per WP:COIEDIT)+ the one that parrots claims of fraud in the 2020 election (ironically, without any evidence)+ the 1-star review complaining about the "Dome of the Rock" article not listing it as a mosque - even though it isn't even a mosque - not understanding that the blue lock ~ means only registered accounts 30+d old and with 500+ edits can edit the article ~ is used to mitigate that same vandalism everyone complains about+ the second review complaining about how editing with a conflict of interest on Wikipedia (e.g. promoting your own corporation on Wikipedia) is frowned upon+ the review writing the site off as propaganda without evidence+ the *many* ironic reviews claiming the site is all lies, (you guessed it) with no elaboration or evidence to their claims+ the review writing the George Floyd 'protests' off as left-wing lies, and in the same vein, all of the other politically motivated reviews claiming that it's all liberal bias+ the many reviews that don't account for the fact that vandalism is usually reverted quickly+ the review claiming right-wing bias+ "Admins ban anyone who looks at any pages" (this isn't how Wikipedia works at all, as they can't see who's looking at a page)
Full of crap. They say trump is making false claims about election fraud when there is evidence, that just shows how much crap this site is all about. Trump will win on basis of election fraud and Wikipedia will delete it but you know what it will be too late. There’s very little sites that are true to there word in 2020
I find it Very annoying, they are always asking for money, they need to use advert so it can fund it self. Or start charging people if they want historical information etc, also Wikipedia must make sure and check out the person background scholarship whoever is giving or putting the information.
I used to use Wikipedia. I even helped them out here and there with $5-10 a year. No more. They allow content on there that's not even true. The first lady is a porn star? That made it's way to the news. Even if you hate her, it's not even true. And they have all kinds of porn when you're trying to find actually find non-porn content. I'm not sure if this is still accurate, but at one time, they were also on the news for having child porn. It's disgusting! I'm done with the website.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
Wikipedia is a free, web-based, collaborative, and multilingual encyclopedia. It is the largest and most popular general reference work on the internet, consisting of freely editable content by a community of volunteers. Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization, it aims to provide a summary of all human knowledge to everyone, globally.
