Wikipedia

2.3
2.3 from 271 Reviews and Ratings
Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.

Average Rating

2.3

/
5

271 Reviews

5 Star
22%
4 Star
12%
3 Star
2%
2 Star
4%
1 Star
60%

Filtered Reviews

Filter Reviews

Review Time

Spreads false information

No Body

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Anti-christian website blasphemous.

Anti-christian website blasphemous makes phone of Jesus but not any other false religion

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
misreprentation of Sushant singh rajput death

Good morning, please check your wikipedia on Sushant Singh Rajput it says cause of death is suicide by hanging which is untrue because the investigating agency has not proved yet. Kindly look into the matter and change it to unknown or else someone is going to sue your company for misrepresentation. Thank you very muchEdwin MendincaNew City, NY

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Definitely positive

Frequent reader on a huge variety of topics. I think Wikipedia has come a long way and is not bad at all, in terms of offering a user-friendly, fairly accurate experience in knowledge.

4
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Full of lies and spin

Look at the George Floyd 'protests' page...Wikipedia references are virtually from all the biased left media such as CNN, BBC, Washington Post, Guardian etc. I will NEVER donate to this currupt organisation.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Faker than fake news

Wikipedia is controlled by george soros. Its completely left biased. You can see completely false narratives on their political pages. If you go to their ‘talk’ page and ask for the proof of fake news they spread, you get blocked for lifetime. I feel its bunch of left wing paid editors who have taken over free platform. NEVER EVER DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA. They get enough funding from left wing and the money you give them, they use that to organize riots all over world to support their left ideology.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
I will never donate to Wikipedia again.

I will never donate another penny to Wikipedia after learning that a large portion of their current writers/fact checkers are communist/marxist apologists. I think Vaush (Look this guy up on Youtube) is a good example of the kinds of people you are relying on for critical information when you decide to use Wikipedia. It used to be a valuable, reliable site. But that was then & this is now, I do not consider it trustworthy anymore. My teachers were right all along, Wikipedia is not a good source of information. I will never donate another penny to this communist apologist organization.

2
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Good

Thanks for providing interesting info

4
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Completely left wing biased garbage…

Completely left wing biased garbage just like most other content that google pushes and of course will only allow.Political discrimination has taken the top spot for discriminatory action in American society. Wikipedia's a shitfest of liberal trash pretending to be relevant!

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Wikipedia is Very bias

Wikipedia is a database that only prints facts that liberals agree with and isn’t really a data bank you can completely depend on. If it goes against their moral liberal values and and states a fact that they don’t like, it’s treated as not true or it’s not put in their database. This means this won’t be printed if this is run by Wikipedia:)

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001

Is this your business?

Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.

Business Details

  • Wikipedia is a free, web-based, collaborative, and multilingual encyclopedia. It is the largest and most popular general reference work on the internet, consisting of freely editable content by a community of volunteers. Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization, it aims to provide a summary of all human knowledge to everyone, globally.