Wikipedia

2.3
2.3 from 271 Reviews and Ratings
Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.

Average Rating

2.3

/
5

271 Reviews

5 Star
22%
4 Star
12%
3 Star
2%
2 Star
4%
1 Star
60%

Filtered Reviews

Filter Reviews

Review Time

biased Left propaganda junk site

biased Left propaganda junk sitelot's of fake news in here, don't know who is reading this sh*t. This is a useless junk website with numerous lies.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
They are very rude complaining about…

They are very rude complaining about non donation! I thought this was a free encyclopedia website! How rude!Block from my search list if can

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Invaluable but untrustworthy source

Wikipedia is a rapid and invaluable encyclopaedic source on almost any conceivable subject. It is not trustworthy, but serves as a summary on most subjects. It tends to focus excessively on American memes and popular fiction and culture, at the expense of objective truth or history. Its primary editorial criterion is by reference to outside publications, which may be dubious, whereas first-hand evidence may be deleted as uncorroborated.With regard to modern, fashionable, political or contentious events and judgements, trolls frequently assert conspiracy theories and nonsense on its pages, which are then taken down by validators as not properly sourced.

4
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Useful information about everything

Useful information about everything. History? Science? Unbiased information?It's here.

5
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Extremely biased Left propaganda junk site

This is a fake and extremely biased website that pushes extreme Left propaganda. They label everyone they don't agree with as conspiracy theorists even when their theories have been proven to be true. This is a useless junk website that will hopefully be sued for their blatant and numerous lies.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Wikipedia is EXCLUSIVE !

I have used them ( wiki ) since inception as a 'bench-mark' information logger without bias.Wikipedia has over time become overridden with similar-self-entitled 'moderators' purporting to be neutral in the manner of... well, the original Encyclopaedias.There is clearly an agenda attached to the site. ( IF ) you know your environment ( History + ), then you'll know what i'm on about. Jim n' Larry might have had noble intensions, but then of course noblemen cannot protect their survivability when socio-political 'reform' is a current muscle of a minority. Follow the money is not a cliché, just do it. Look who majorly 'donates' money to the site. Whether you're this way or that way never matters. but monitoring who does the funding is always a good indicator as to what info you will receive within wiki.( I used to place small funds into wiki as thanks, but despite their persistent notion they need more donation, it further espouses a sense of abuse when your neutrality in it's self is bias is backed by a socio-political forecast. Irony of ironies.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Full of self righteous editors that…

Full of self righteous editors that edit to suit their own agenda. Definitely not giving these clowns another cent.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
What a rude organization!

What a rude organization!I donated to them, then attempted to build a profile bio.ONLY to be rudely messaged as they immediately shut down the acct I had just built. Make a mistake on your profile; Get shut down! WHY WOULD ANYONE DONATE to this organization.?I feel stupid.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
I donate to Wikipedia once a year on my…

NO MORE! I donate to Wikipedia once a year on my time. NO MORE! It's like their demanding or shut you down. So stick it!

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001
Strict policies and rude admins

Wikipedia is so bad, they are unreliable and when my appeal was rejected, they started the decline reason with the word “And”! I thought they expected you to use good English and admins start a whole paragraph with that? They’re so rude as well! Also, their policies are too strict and should allow for a 2nd chance when blocked. Overall, I think you should only use Wikipedia for basic research and find other places. While I don’t necessarily hate Wikipedia, I don’t think they deserve even one star.

1
Date of experience: Jan 01, 0001

Is this your business?

Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.

Business Details

  • Wikipedia is a free, web-based, collaborative, and multilingual encyclopedia. It is the largest and most popular general reference work on the internet, consisting of freely editable content by a community of volunteers. Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization, it aims to provide a summary of all human knowledge to everyone, globally.