Review Time
A long time ago you could trust that Wikipedia would provide all sources or angels on all topics or articles.You could trust this because it was openly crowdsourced.However Wikipedia has now been infected by fanatical extreme posionus users who work in harmony to ruin, censor and destory information.At current time you cannot rely on that all sources has been noted or that any information has been removed for historical events.This is not only tied to recent events but also historical events from hundres of years ago.
I love Wikipedia. For all its "buts" and weaknesses, it is still an amazing and unique source of shared knowledge.I just Wikipedia made it easier to donate. Their checkout is just so quirky and anti-smooth. I simply don't have the time and energy to overcome its awkwardness. Please make it easier to contribute.
The serious repercussions of Wikipedia's lack of integrity should not be taken lightly. Its clear left-wing leanings have caused a sense of instability and doubt. The vast majority of the website's contributors have a far-left ideology, resulting in a skewed portrayal of conservatives and oftentimes inaccurate statements. Unfortunately, there is no way to completely get rid of these biases, making it impossible to trust the content.Jimmy Wales, the CEO of Wikipedia, has shown his approval of the website's tendency to display a biased perspective against conservatives. For instance, the terms 'far-right', 'white nationalist' and 'conspiracy theorist' are used to label right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer and Tommy Robinson, but the same terms are not applied to radical far-left figures like Cenk Uygur and Kyle Kulinski. It is therefore essential that you are aware of this when you are accessing information through Wikipedia.
Not neutral anymore. Woke radical left biased propaganda machine!I was appalled with some articles bias, especially on culture war, something that was supposed to be neutral is now part of the left machine. Wikipedia should be investigated for suspicious donations.Just went into browser blocked filter, goodbye.
The system is broken, and over-taken by admins who cannot be impartial or unbiased. The content is now the result of popular opinion rather than fact based or citeable sources. They block users who point out that information has no citable source if the information is popular.
This is such a 'fake news' website. Why do you think all that information is free ? They want us to believe all the stuff that they are pedal pushing out to to us. They create pages to report other websites as fake news but, where is the proof ? This tactic of theirs undermines free and critical thinking. Hey wikipedia, if you're not threatened by the so called 'fake news', then just leave them alone. The truth will all come out in the end ... maybe that's what you're really threatened by.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
Wikipedia is a free, web-based, collaborative, and multilingual encyclopedia. It is the largest and most popular general reference work on the internet, consisting of freely editable content by a community of volunteers. Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization, it aims to provide a summary of all human knowledge to everyone, globally.
