Review of eventbrite
Review of buzzsprout
Review of co
The BBC has finally lost the plot! Not content with forcibly charging a licence fee for listening and watching their stuff, you have to "log-in". What is there to log in to? I dont have a personal account with the BBC that needs protecting. I am just trying to listen / look to publicly presented media. As if that were not enough reason to complain, we cannot view BBC programmes abroad, despite paying the fee and despite logging as ourselves. And finally, this weekend the BBC announces we now cannot listen to BBC radio when abroad. The BBC needs to work out who the customer is these days - it is clearly not the gen public. Why is it we can watch and listen to Al Jazeera anywhere in the world but the BBC is so precious that unless you pay and log in and you are in the UK you are barred? The BBC are ridiculous and becoming less relevant and a laughing stock more everyday. The sad thing is that the BBC presenters are really good - but that is no good if you have to jump through so many hoops and bars to watch them.
Review of att
I have been a att customer since Bellsouth mobility for no reason they increase my cell bill 25.00 . They truly don't believe in customer in keeping your business. I true wouldn't recommend AT@T wireless and this coming from a person who has Been with thee since Bellsouth Mobility but no more.
Review of amnesty
Amnesty. You can forward to Institut for Menneskerettigheder, Denmark who I contacted more than one time.However not as Mrs. O and Mrs. C WHO spot the unknown.You only act when the political purpose fits your need.
Review of theepochtimes
Review of Spotify
Review of parallels
Parallels is too good. I was first confused with desktop-sharing with Mac.This can be because I was a user of old version of fusion, which is not compatible with M1 nor M2 stone bearing Mac. I am all right to pay USD100 for parallels but not for Windows OS. Can we continue to use Windows OS without paying to them?
Review of medium
Review of google
Lately a rather disturbing development. When writing reviews, they are not posted claiming they violate their policies. Because they are suspected to be meant to manipulate a company's score. Isn't that the very point of reviews? If both positive and negative reviews are not accepted and only very shallow content is allowed, what are the values and reliability of this platform?
Review of google
Why hasn't Google updated it's street views from 2010. I typed in the address I wanted and it shows open fields and I know for sure that there is a large housing estate there. Surely this is important, especially when I have the address and post code for the homes.
Review of google
Lately a rather disturbing development. When writing reviews, they are not posted claiming they violate their policies. Because they are suspected to be meant to manipulate a company's score. Isn't that the very point of reviews? If both positive and negative reviews are not accepted and only very shallow content is allowed, what are the values and reliability of this platform?
Review of google
Why hasn't Google updated it's street views from 2010. I typed in the address I wanted and it shows open fields and I know for sure that there is a large housing estate there. Surely this is important, especially when I have the address and post code for the homes.
Review of avast
Review of google
Lately a rather disturbing development. When writing reviews, they are not posted claiming they violate their policies. Because they are suspected to be meant to manipulate a company's score. Isn't that the very point of reviews? If both positive and negative reviews are not accepted and only very shallow content is allowed, what are the values and reliability of this platform?
Review of google
Why hasn't Google updated it's street views from 2010. I typed in the address I wanted and it shows open fields and I know for sure that there is a large housing estate there. Surely this is important, especially when I have the address and post code for the homes.
Review of avast
Review of google
Lately a rather disturbing development. When writing reviews, they are not posted claiming they violate their policies. Because they are suspected to be meant to manipulate a company's score. Isn't that the very point of reviews? If both positive and negative reviews are not accepted and only very shallow content is allowed, what are the values and reliability of this platform?
Review of google
Why hasn't Google updated it's street views from 2010. I typed in the address I wanted and it shows open fields and I know for sure that there is a large housing estate there. Surely this is important, especially when I have the address and post code for the homes.
Review of avast
