"The world's largest source of information"? More like "the world's largest joke." As if all the political bias and shadowbans weren't bad enough, even seemingly normal articles like those for Joy Division are under heavy surveillance by gatekeeping admins. I added sourced genres for the articles of 'Unknown Pleasures' and 'Closer' that came from an encyclopedic book. However, an admin named FMSky removed them because they were not based on popular opinion. The book, 'A History of Rock and Dance Music' by Piero Scaruffi, is widely available and can be found on Google Shopping. FMSky also told me that they aren't an admin, but they behave like one anyway as they are often involved in censoring articles.Eventually, another admin named Woovee visited my page to tell me that an ENTIRE committee of admins agreed on my source being unwelcome. This is just because the book author's website is self-published. I cited the book, not the website. It felt like a school conference, but worse. Woovee also told me that it's the journalist's opinion that matters, not the user's. In reality, it's the Wikipedia admins that control the whole narrative. Woovee told me this when I removed the "gothic rock" genre from the 'Closer' article, not realizing that a music review already mentioned the genre in the article. In short, Wikipedia is the right-hand man of TikTok, ruining the world one step at a time. If you want to support Joy Division, buy their merch, stream their music, perhaps even get inspired by them. The admins mentioned in this review are actually normal users like you and me, but are completely brainwashed by Wikipedia's toxicity. If you're still thinking of supporting this dystopian database, you're better off peeling potatoes at a food drive or pushing your luck on a dating site/app.
