These writers should be ashamed of themselves. They contribute heavily to the standardization of publishing personal (uninformed) opinion as journalism. That it’s done in the context of entertainment should not mean that they have license to fabricate. And they do it so liberally that the average reader will detect the farse readily, even without being and expert in the area. In the article that I just read, the whole narrative was encased with the plot and scenes of a very successful and entertaining movie, as if it were a documentary, with a few additional facts inserted; such that the very structure of the “article” betrayed the author’s plagiarist intent - her ink, brush and canvas all at once. I had a similar experience some time ago with screenrant, which seem to validate the negative reviews in a very specific way. This is unfortunate enough to compel someone to write a review like this one, never read a screenrant piece again, and warn others not to waste their time doing so (if they have any regard for accuracy at all).
