I complained about my financial adviser who had a data breach that led to my and my daughter's identities being stolen, as well as money, emails, phone numbers, financial history. When I reported the breach I had less evidences than what I have today. But enough for them to say : it is likely your adviser had a breach. And then.... they close the case!!! Didn't give me a chance to add evidences. So the adviser has a laugh, says he won't investigate where the breach comes from, even refutes it despite the evidence, because he says "the ICO closed the case". I appealledbut the appeal was rejected,now it's going to my MP. ICO is partly funded by the government and partly by private companies. Some of these companies are the companies we complain against. So you tell me : how can the ICO be impartial? No wonder they let reckless companies victim of data breach get away with murder or rather get away with data breach. ICO has become irrelevant and outdated. Waste of tax payer money
