Twitter has gone from deplatforming, shadow banning opposing opinions to banning , suspending , locking users in its current iteration. To "appeal," is the respondent another algorithm? Users reinstated claim one day turn around of their suspension while others appear to have no interaction to reverse the block. While Twitter rules appear quite simplistic in its effort to achieve "public conversation"... " Our rules are to ensure all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely."The algorithm is doing something entirely different than the original Twitter by outright removal via multiple "complaints"potentially. No appearance of verification for a rule contravention takes place,and users who oppose a user's tweet are doing the removal of "free"speech. It is troublesome to see users lose their ability to engage with those who can hide behind regulations,or laws that can negatively impact citizens.