Absolute clowns! I played and won some games fairly and they claimed I must have cheated! Turns out, I also lost as many games. These people do not define chess, and really are as bad as the other reviewers are saying here! I take Allegations of cheating seriously, and would have no qualms about suing these jerks! Bring it on! If you are going to use actionable words in your accusations, you can expect a reply. You better also be able to prove your allegations. You are talking to a responsible adult this time, not another teenager you can accuse and bully! They are very stupid people, who are actively banning thousands of innocent people! Seems you just have to claim that you couldn't possibly have lost a game, hence your opponent must have cheated and that's enough! Reality is, some of us are pretty decent players, but have real world careers that prevent us from going to competitions, which is all that is really required to get a rating and even a title. Your biggest fault is assuming everyone is a complete beginner, who has not also read books, played at club level, been tutored, and learned the game, and may well be playing at the level of masters or above. Such a patronizing attitude. No good chess player should use chess.com. Winning seems to be frowned on At chess.com. If you win and play well, they assume you must have cheated! Not a good environment for an improving chess player! I strongly believe the real reason they Banned me, was for commenting on their boards about the ability some others have to boot you out of games, and off the web. This only ever happens when you are about to win a game! Your opponent gets the win and the points! Who would have that power, outside of the site admin themselves? That would be cheating!
