The app restricts your usage. This app truly demonstrates the restriction of one's freedom. It restricts how many words can be submitted which limits the overall possible answer that could be returned. It restricts what you can and can not say. It restricts access to the internet, a real compiler and to your system files, unless you pay them to have access to your own internet, compiler, and file system. The actual screen you communicate with is too small, the scroll bar is buggy, when prompted for input on how chatgpt is doing it doesnt let you scroll down without picking an answer for you ( Which means its not getting real people input results anymore and part of the reason that's its starting to dumb down instead of getting better because developers are not getting the proper feedback). There is no way to make a new line in-between information drops or files. Normally you would just press enter to get a new line but enter is the submit button. The app wastes a lot of screen space. It would have been better as a desktop with the right features least then they could have provided coders with a coders version that was an ide.As a programmer the ai is biased and is lazy. It is always trying to return pseudo code or unfulfilled code which is unhelpful if it is supposed to be a programmers tool. Half the time it produces code that is unuseful and will not recheck the entire code when you tell it that is wrong. It gets stuck on one part and becomes narrow minded in trying to fix that one part instead of referencing the entire code handed to it. It lacks simple algorithms' that restrain it from things like renaming your functions. It clearly favors the linux way of doing things and lacks in windows dev. I prefer to dev for both so this is irritating.Furthermore this app isn't that toxic SO/SE site and it's not a human, so it should not be complaining, about how big the project is. It is a tool, and that tool should just code the project asked of it. Otherwise what's the point of it in the first place. The very importance of what this app could have been, relies on the the ai tool being able to handle full coding projects, to help programmer's so it needs a compiler for all languages with access to a file system. Instead you have limited it and trying to make it just another programmer but we need it better then a programmer. Most programmers are rude, biase, narrow minded, and do not help each other, which is unacceptable behaviour and even more unacceptable in an ai tool. It is very clear and evident the developers designed it to represent their coding behaviors and biases.It lacks options. As a coder I should have the option to make it return the full code without having to keep telling it. Others can have the option for it to return only the newly added code. There should be an option to reply back with code and details vs pure information drops. Like I said chatgpt is lazy and will try not to give code, it prefers info drops, and will try just to give info.There needs to be a version control save point, so when you have a good version of the project you're working on, then it can always refer back to that saved version. Instead of assuming every msg is a new project.The developers are trying to make it good at everything instead of narrowing it down to a few good paths. They could make the app itself the communicator and make it communicate with a plug in framework to other bots. These other bots would specialize in a particular path and allow the developer to focus more on certain algorithms needed for that path.If I can not test the app in a free trial with unlimited features then there is no way I am going to pay. I will not pay to see if the small amount of extras they provide is worth it or the restrictions they place. Why would an app force someone to pay, in order to gain access, to the internet they already bought and a file system they already own? Instead it should be that you pay to access legit plug-ins, that work with your other apps, and makes your overall workflow easier. But this doesn't happen either because none of the plugins designed, third party or none third party, integrate properly and if it does work expect another payment to be able to use on top of the payment you already have. Chatgpt and the plugins designed for it lack better documentation on how to use together. Chat Gpt doesn't support a real compiler that integrates with all the languages instead it evident that chat gpt's biases comes from the developers who created it by only providing a python interpreter. So they are allowed to be openly biased of their own culture and prefered languages while openly suppressing yours. I hope this gets back to ChatGpt developers. This whole program is a representation of their skills or lack of in this instance.
